Home / PC H/W Reviews / Core PC Components / PC Storage and RAM Kit Reviews / WD Black WD2002FAEX 2TB 3.5″ HDD Review
WD2002FAEX boxshot

WD Black WD2002FAEX 2TB 3.5″ HDD Review

  1. Introduction
  2. Specification and Closer Look
  3. Test Bench and Methodology
  4. Conclusion
  5. View All

I have received the WD Black WD2002FAEX to review. Last time when I reviewed the WD Red series, it made a good impression especially when it comes to temperatures during load. It makes a lot more sense to go for such drives when you’re considering RAID 0 configurations, although I am hoping to upgrade a more suitable test bench once Haswell/ Newer gen Ivy Bridge comes up, especially keep RAID 0 testing in mind.

IMG_1673

Then I’ve tested the 1TB Velociraptor which made a good impression, although its older 600GB counterpart did have the lowest boot load times compared to ALL of the mechanical drives. But where do blue and black series fit? Especially when Mechanical drives are something that is now would be considered to be used as a secondary storage as more and more people doing the right thing by having an SSD as their primary drive- well- those who can afford anyway.

I initially wished that I could be done testing the Toshiba DT01ACA drives which are more than 500GB capacity to see how they stack up against WD and/or Seagate. Unfortunately, for now, it didn’t work out so we’ll have to do with what we have.

ADVSPEC

The first thing you’ll notice is that the drive is rated to consume 10.70 wars during read and write, whereas during idle its rated to consume 8.20 watts. It should also be noted that despite Velociraptor comes with a massive heatsink, its 0.25kg lights compared to this drive on paper. The operating temperature is as same as what velociraptor has.

Moving on…

IMG_1683IMG_1685

IMG_1691

Like all hard drives, there is a foam sandwiched between the drive and the PCB.

IMG_1694

IMG_1697IMG_1698IMG_1700

WD uses Smooth’s L7251 3.1 ver. motor controller, Marvell’s 88i9045-TFJ2 controller and Hynix H5DU5162ETR-E3C 64MB DDR Chip for the drive’s Cache buffer.

IMG_1702

I also wanted to note that throughout the time I have reviewed hard drives, Amphenol makes stronger HDD I/O connector in comparison with Foxconn’s alternative. Not that it matters to a lot of people, just something to point out.

It gives me great pleasure every time I put up a review. Its always good to appreciate the support that the manufacturers give from time-to-time to review their own products and others on behalf of the readers. Thanks to companies such as Asus, Gigabyte, Kingston, WD and Coolermaster who give me hardware support by updating my test rig no strings attached. Thumbs up to these guys!

I would like to thank

  • Gigabyte India for providing Gigabyte 890GPA UD3H Rev 1.0 motherboard
  • Asus India for providing Asus 990FX Sabertooth motherboard
  • Kingston Taiwan for providing hardware support with memory kits and SSD drive.
  • WD India for providing WD 300GB HLFS Velociraptor Hard Drive.
  • Coolermaster India for providing Coolermaster GX450 RS-450-ACAA-D3 Power Supply
Test Setup for: WD Velociraptor WD1000DHTZ 1TB SATA III Storage Drive
Motherboard+ Processor Gigabyte 890GPAUD3H Rev 1.0+ AMD 965BE
Memory Kingston KHX1600C9D3P1K28G HyperX Genesis 8GB 1600MHz DDRIII
Primary OS drive WD 3000HLFS Velociraptor 300GB/ WD Blue AAJS 320GB/ WD 1TB Velociraptor
Power Supply Coolermaster GX450
Chassis Antec Eleven Hundred

The Benchmarks that I am using are as follows:

AS SSD– Read and Write (Pass 3)

ATTO- Test File Size= 0.5 to 8MB- Read and Write Pass 3

Aida64- Write and Read Access time File Size 64KB Pass 3

Anvil Benchmark-  Compressible and Incompressible run each with 4, 16 and 32MB File Size

Boot Load Test- (Windows 7 SP1 clean installation with AMD 12.6 drivers+ AHCI drivers pre-installed with Utorrent, Avira Security Suite, Asus Xonar DX+ 7.12.8.1794 Drivers, Netgear WG111 Wireless LAN USB drive software as start-up items) Pass 1-5 (Pass 1= System start from Power Off)

Transfer Tests- 1.34GB Assorted Photos transfer Test, 11.34 ISO File Transfer Test, 1.27GB Compressed Data File Transfer Test and 98.39 Assorted Movies Folder Transfer Test with TeraCopy

CrystalDisk Mark Benchmark- with Pass 3, each with 5 re-runs 1000MB File Size

HDTune Pro- Write and Read Pass 3

PCMark 7- HDD test

PCMark Vantage- HDD Test

Anvil Benchmark- 4/16/32GB File Size in both 0% and 100% Fill test

  • AS SSD Benchmark
  • Although this drive is used for AS SSDs, the tests in these give a good idea of Sequential, 4K Aligned, 4K Aligned with 64Bit thread test and the Access time of the hard drive using incompressible data.

    as ssd

    asssdread

    When it comes to sequential read, WD 2002FAEX is surprisingly only faster than WD 3TB EZRS drive. One would expect to be only slower than the Velociraptor but that’s the case. Access time for read also not impressive for a Caviar Black as many would expect.

    asssdwrite

    Same as read- except the access time is one of the lowest in the chart.

  • ATTO Benchmark
  • With a transfer sizes from 0.5KB through 8192KB and a total length of 256MB, ATTO measures transfer speed throughout the drive’s storage capacity for both reads and writes.

    atto

    The drive is maxed out from 16KB file size to 8MB, maintaining between 135MB write and 139MB Read minimum.

    attoread

    Between medium-to-large filesize, the drive is only faster than Seagate and WD’s green variant when it comes to sequential read. Ouch!!

    attowrite

    When it comes to write speeds, it goes head-to-head with Seagate’s ST33000651AS and WD’s 3TB EFRX.

  • AIDA64 Benchmark
  • aidaread

    aidawrite

    aidaread

    Looking at the average, the drive is only second to Velociraptor. I wish I could have seen the same results in the previous synthetic tests.

    aidawrite

    But when it comes to write speeds, it’s the quickest so far!

  • Anvil Benchmark
  • Compressible Data

    41632

    Incompressible Data

    41632

  • Boot Load Test
  • Windows 7 SP1 clean installation with AMD 12.6 drivers+ AHCI drivers pre-installed with Utorrent, Avira Security Suite, Asus Xonar DX+ 7.12.8.1794 Drivers, Netgear WG111 Wireless LAN USB drive software as start-up items) Pass 1-5 (Pass 1= System start from Power Off

    boot

    WD’s own 3TB EZRS is doing better than the Black counterpart. WD’s 600GB HLHX is still the lowest of all mechanical drives.

  • CrystalDisk Mark Benchmark
  • With the file size of 1000MB, CrystalDiskMark is set to random (incompressible data) and tests Sequential, 512K, 4KB without and WITH Queue Depth 64.

    cdm

    cdiread

    Looking at 512K Random, its slower only compared to both the Velociraptors.

    cdiwrite

    EFRX and both the velociraptor models stay ahead of FAEX Black in the 512k random write test.

  • HDTune Pro Benchmark
  • HDTRead

    HDWrite

    hdtread

    hdtwrite

  • PCMark 7 Benchmark
  • PCM7HDD

    pcm7hdd

    With the exception of adding music, the drive stands well just below 1TB DHTZ Velociraptor.

    In Windows media centre test, the single platter Toshiba DT01ACA 500gig has an advantage, but that’s even more clear with the PCMark 7.

    pcmvhdd

    pcmvhdd

    But when it comes to other tests, it stays on well.

  • Transfer Tests
  • trns

    The long 98.39GB assorted movie folder transfer is where the drive took about 5 minutes longer than the velociraptor.

    I have received the WD Black WD2002FAEX to review. Last time when I reviewed the WD Red series, it made a good impression especially when it comes to temperatures during load. It makes a lot more sense to go for such drives when you’re considering RAID 0 configurations, although I am hoping to upgrade a more suitable test bench once Haswell/ Newer gen Ivy Bridge comes up, especially keep RAID 0 testing in mind. Then I’ve tested the 1TB Velociraptor which made a good impression, although its older 600GB counterpart did have the lowest boot load times compared to ALL of…

    Review Overview

    Performance - 7
    Storage Space - 7
    Overall Value - 6.5

    6.8

    BBQ Score

    Summary : Well, its not the fastest drive when it comes to boot and long transfers, so this drive is suited to be used secondary drive. I am saying because the drive is absolutely silent as a secondary drive, even with 12TB endurance testing that takes about 1 1/2- 2 days. But when it comes to be used as a primary, the drives does have the tendency to make an audible noise almost similar to the velociraptor. 2TB EFRX and Seagate’s Barracuda XT seem to be bit more suitable for that if you don’t want to break a bank- or else you can always do a favour to yourself and make plans to get an SSD as a primary drive and one of the drives of your choice as a secondary drive.

    As always, WD Black comes with 5 years warranty.

    India (Online) U.K. U.S.
    Rs. 10,051/- £135.79 $164.45

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *